JD Vance won the debate, but it probably will not matter
Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free
The stories that matter on money and politics in the race for the White House
It is a truism that US vice-presidential debates rarely affect the electoral outcome. After Tim Walzās lacklustre showing against JD Vance on Tuesday night, Democrats will be praying that still holds.
Political betting site Polymarket gave Walz a 70 per cent chance of winning at the start of the debate. By the end he was trading at just 33 cents. It will be some consolation that the TV viewing numbers are likely to be far lower than the audience of almost 70mn that tuned into Kamala Harrisās encounter with Donald Trump last month.
Either way, the Vance-Walz debate was probably the last of the 2024 presidential campaign. Trump has shown no interest in agreeing to Harrisās call for a second encounter, understandable given how much blood she drew in their first.
In terms of how America votes on November 5, Tuesdayās āveep debateā may not even rank as the second-most impactful event of the day. The first was Iranās missile attack on Israel and the threat of a wider Middle Eastern war. If sustained, the jump in crude oil on Tuesday will feed into higher US fuel prices and hit consumer sentiment, which would harm Harris. Any impression of Middle East chaos is also likely to play into Trumpās hands.
The second-most important event on Tuesday was arguably Trump pulling out of CBSās widely watched 60 Minutes show next week and Harris confirming her participation. How she comes across in that interview, and the fact of Trumpās absence, is likely to have more sway than the Vance-Walz debate with the few million American voters who are still undecided.
Nevertheless the vice-presidential encounter offered several pointers on the nature of this election. Three stood out.
The first was Vanceās confidence and fluency. The Ohio senator also told some whopping lies. Of these, Vanceās claim that he had never supported a federal abortion ban and that Trump strengthened the Affordable Care Act, also known as āObamacareā, were most egregious. Vance has consistently backed a national ban and other restrictions on womenās bodily autonomy. Trump tried to abolish the ACA multiple times.
Vance also conspicuously dodged questions about whether the 2020 election was stolen. His evasions may come back to haunt him. Overall though, Vance evidently took on board widespread advice to come across as more likeable. The debate was a mirror image of last monthās Trump-Harris encounter. Both vice-presidential candidates were civil throughout.
Second, Walz was nervous and often faltering. The Harris-Walz campaign has taken some pride in avoiding mainstream media interviews and press conferences. Walzās exposure has mostly been in soft settings with friendly journalists. Vance, by contrast, has been touring the Sunday morning shows almost every week. His slick evasions and polished whataboutisms betrayed many hours of practice on live TV.
The Harris-Walz campaign may come to regret their preference for gentler surroundings. Americaās relatively small but potentially decisive share of wavering voters repeatedly tell pollsters that they want more information about Harrisās policies. That Trump has supplied much less policy detail is striking. But nobody said politics was fair.
Finally, Tuesday night offered a glimpse into one of Americaās possible futures. Given the running matesā respective age differences with their bosses, Vanceās performance was more significant. At 40, he is barely half Trumpās age. The prospect that a second term Trump would yield to a Vance administration before it ends is significantly higher than that of Harris giving way to Walz, who is several months older than her.
Vance conveyed Trumpism in its palatable form. He stood up for every tenet of Trumpism, including his refusal to accept that Biden won the 2020 election. But his mien was tempered and reasonable.
Many Republicans last year invested great hope in Floridaās Ron DeSantis as the man who could uphold Trumpism without Trump. DeSantis turned out to be a dud in debates and on the hustings. Vance, on the other hand, has a future whatever happens next month. Liberals are right to fear Vance; he is a hardline Christian nationalist. After Tuesday night, however, they would be rash to dismiss him.
