Locking In Value: How GPs Use Crystallization to Balance Incentives | DarrowEverett LLP

Crystallization is a pivotal concept in private equity fund management, particularly for General Partners (GPs) seeking to realize the value of their carried interest, or “promote.” As private equity funds mature and assets are monetized, the timing and method of crystallizing a promote can have significant implications for both GPs and Limited Partners (LPs). This Insight provides an overview of crystallization, explores common implementation methods and triggers, examines the effects of locked-in crystallization, and outlines distribution options and key tax considerations.

What is Crystallization?

Crystallization refers to the process by which a GP’s entitlement to carried interest is fixed or “locked in” at a certain point in time, based on the value of the fund’s assets or performance. This mechanism is designed to provide GPs with certainty regarding their promote, while also aligning interests with LPs as the fund progresses through its life cycle.

Implementation Methods

Crystallization can be implemented in several ways, depending on the fund’s structure and the negotiated terms between GPs and LPs. The two most common approaches are:

• Pro Rata Crystallization: The GP’s promote is fixed at a certain value (see below for calculating the crystallized promote value), and all subsequent distributions are made pro rata between the GP and LPs based on their crystallized entitlements.
• Locked-In Promote Value with Upside Participation: The GP’s promote is crystallized at a set value, but the GP remains entitled to a share of gains realized above the crystallized amount. This structure allows GPs to benefit from future outperformance while providing LPs with clarity on the promote already earned.

Calculating Crystallized Promote Value

The most common method for determining crystallized promote is based on fair market value (FMV) and a hypothetical liquidation of the fund’s assets. Rather than waiting for full realization, the fund is assessed as if it were liquidated at the crystallization date.

The process begins with establishing FMV for all assets (i.e., realized, partially exited, and unrealized) using market comparables, discounted cash flows, or third-party appraisals as of the crystallization date. Next, a hypothetical liquidation waterfall is run, allocating proceeds first to LPs for capital contributions and preferred returns, applying catch-up provisions where applicable, and finally determining the GP’s promote as if all assets had been sold at that value.

Adjustments are made for prior distributions or specific waterfall features, ensuring the final crystallized promote accurately reflects the GP’s economic entitlement. This figure then serves as the basis for future distributions or monetization, providing a clear benchmark for all parties.

Typical Triggers for Crystallization

Crystallization is typically triggered by specific events, which may include:

• The sale or refinancing of a significant portfolio asset
• The occurrence of a fund-level liquidity event
• The expiration of a predetermined investment period
• The achievement of certain performance milestones or hurdles

The precise triggers are usually negotiated at the outset of the fund and documented in the limited partnership (or equivalent) agreement.

Effects of Locked-In Crystallization

The choice of crystallization mechanism can have material effects on future distributions and the alignment of interests between GPs and LPs:

• Pro Rata Distributions: Once crystallization occurs, all subsequent distributions are allocated between GPs and LPs in accordance with their crystallized interests. This approach provides predictability but may reduce the GP’s incentive to maximize value post-crystallization.
• Locked-In Promote With Continued Upside: By allowing GPs to participate in gains above the crystallized value, this structure maintains some alignment of interests and incentivizes continued outperformance of the fund. The net effect of crystallization, if the fund does exceed the crystallized value and GPs retain an upside incentive, is the time value of distributions. The GP receives distributions of promote sooner than it otherwise would; LPs would likewise see proportional delays in distributions.

Distribution Options: Cash, Equity, or Combination

Upon crystallization, GPs may receive their promote in various forms:

• Cash: Immediate liquidity, often preferred for its simplicity and certainty.
• Equity: GPs may receive an equity interest (i.e., a capital interest) in the underlying assets, aligning their interests with LPs for future appreciation.
• Combination: A hybrid approach, providing both immediate liquidity and continued participation in future upside.

The choice among these options will depend on the fund’s liquidity profile, the nature of the underlying assets, and the preferences of both GPs and LPs.

Tax Considerations

Crystallization events carry important tax implications for GPs, and the law is not well settled on the tax effects of crystallization. The central questions are whether crystallization itself gives rise to a taxable event and whether crystallization would change the characterization of the GP’s income.

Typically, funds and GPs treat the promote as a “profits interest,” so that it is not taxable upon the GPs’ receipt of the interest. Generally, if the crystallization process only adjusts a GP’s interest—without any cash or property distribution—no immediate tax liability should arise, and taxation should be deferred until gains are ultimately realized. By contrast, if crystallization involves a cash payout or the transfer of property, income may need to be recognized at that point, potentially at capital gains or ordinary income rates depending on the structure and timing, and the value of the remainder of the GP’s interest may be converted to a “capital interest” and taxed at crystallization.

Additionally, following the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, GPs must hold their promote for three years to receive long term capital gains treatment (instead of the one year holding period required by prior law). If the crystallization occurs during the first three years of the fund, this may affect the GP’s ability to receive long term capital gains treatment on income from the fund. The timing and form of crystallization can directly affect both the character and timing of taxable income, so GPs should work closely with tax advisors to design provisions that achieve the intended economic outcome while avoiding unintended tax consequences.

Conclusion

Crystallization is a critical tool for GPs in private equity, offering a mechanism to realize and secure promote value while balancing the interests of LPs. Careful consideration of the method, triggers, distribution options, and tax consequences is essential to ensure that crystallization achieves its intended objectives and supports the long-term success of the fund.

[View source.]