Appeals court looks receptive to Trump in civil fraud case

Appeals court looks receptive to Trump in civil fraud case


Left: New York Attorney General Letitia James speaks to the media, Nov. 6, 2023, in New York. AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey, File /Center: Justice Engoron. AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File./Right: Former President Donald Trump speaks during a break in closing arguments at New York Supreme Court, Thursday, Jan. 11, 2024, in New York. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

Left: New York Attorney General Letitia James speaks to the media, Nov. 6, 2023, in New York (AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey, File). Center: Justice Engoron. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File). Right: Former President Donald Trump speaks during a break in closing arguments at New York Supreme Court, Thursday, Jan. 11, 2024, in New York. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig).

Attorneys for former President Donald Trump made their case for overturning his $454 million civil fraud judgment before a panel of appellate judges in New York City on Thursday afternoon.

In July, Trump filed a 116-page appellate brief with the New York Supreme Court’s Appellate Division, First Department. At the heart of the long-and-winding appeal is an allegation the trial court violated the law by allowing New York Attorney General Letitia James to bring time-barred claims against Trump and his namesake family business.

In more headline-generating terms, Trump argued the lower court, helmed by Justice Arthur Engoron, allowed James, a Democrat, to go after her avowed political enemy for violations that “do not exist at all” and to secure “draconian, unlawful, and unconstitutional penalties.”

The attorney general’s office, in response, argued there was “overwhelming evidence” the Trump Organization “acted with an intent to defraud” by engaging in an “illegal scheme to misleadingly inflate the net worth” of Trump himself “by as much $2.2 billion a year.”





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *